Case Comment

Improver Corp. v.
Remington Consumer Products Ltd.

citation(s): (1989) R.P.C. 69 (U.K. Court of Appeal per Dillon L.J.)

copyright 1997 Donald M. Cameron, Aird & Berlis




The Decision

At p. 78

"In the light of Lord Diplock's speech in Catnic, it has to be remembered that what is being considered is all the process of asking and answering the single question whether or not there has been infringement."


Return to:

Cameron's IT Law: Home Page; Index

Cameron's Canadian Patent & Trade Secrets Law: Home Page; Index

JurisDiction Home Page