Case Comment

Lester v. Commissioner of Patents

citation(s): (1946), 6 C.P.R. 3 (Ex.Ct. per O'Connor J.)


copyright 2006 Donald M. Cameron


Contents


Summary


Facts

Lester had applied for a patent for a toy plastic pistol that had an arrangement of walls which formed a whistle.  The Commissioner of Patents had rejected the patent application.


The Decision

At p. 3:

The pistol and the whistle are not combined to produce a common result.  Each part performs its function independently of the other.  I reach the conclusion that this is not a patentable combination.

The authorities are quite clear that a combination is not patentable where each part performs its function independently of the other and the parts are not combined to produce some common result.


Return to:

Cameron's IT Law: Home Page; Index

Cameron's Canadian Patent & Trade Secrets Law: Home Page; Index

JurisDiction Home Page